<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Channel Signal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.channelsignal.com/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.channelsignal.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 13:30:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Consumers Buy from Cause-Related Companies by Paul Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://blog.channelsignal.com/index.php/2010/09/consumers-buy-from-cause-related-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kirwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 13:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.channelsignal.com/?p=2116#comment-743</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your kind words. It takes work, but it is worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your kind words. It takes work, but it is worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on South Butt, Part Two by Paul Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://blog.channelsignal.com/index.php/2011/02/south-butt-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kirwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.channelsignal.com/?p=2447#comment-711</guid>
		<description>Jim, Good to hear from you. Just to clarify, The South Butt was a conflict between South Butt and The North Face. 
Univarsity and Nike now have the conflict. You probably already knew this, but I was a little confused by your response. 
And, like you, I now doubt that any large company is willing to sacrifice any brand equity for the benefit of small companies. 
Small companies have a lot of new tools to compete, mostly in new media. There are many ways for 
a young company to get its message out. And if some want to take on 800 pound gorillas, well, they better know what they are doing. 
Protection of brand equity is a bed-rock principle for many of these large companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, Good to hear from you. Just to clarify, The South Butt was a conflict between South Butt and The North Face.<br />
Univarsity and Nike now have the conflict. You probably already knew this, but I was a little confused by your response.<br />
And, like you, I now doubt that any large company is willing to sacrifice any brand equity for the benefit of small companies.<br />
Small companies have a lot of new tools to compete, mostly in new media. There are many ways for<br />
a young company to get its message out. And if some want to take on 800 pound gorillas, well, they better know what they are doing.<br />
Protection of brand equity is a bed-rock principle for many of these large companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on South Butt, Part Two by James Moss</title>
		<link>http://blog.channelsignal.com/index.php/2011/02/south-butt-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>James Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 01:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.channelsignal.com/?p=2447#comment-710</guid>
		<description>I always hoped that Nike&#039;s actions with South Butt and now Univarsity was done intentionally to help promote small companies. 

OK, naive. But I thought that ideas was better than thinking Nike was that dumb!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always hoped that Nike&#8217;s actions with South Butt and now Univarsity was done intentionally to help promote small companies. </p>
<p>OK, naive. But I thought that ideas was better than thinking Nike was that dumb!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on With or Without Your Company by Paul Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://blog.channelsignal.com/index.php/2009/01/with-or-without-your-company/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kirwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.channelsignal.com/?p=209#comment-687</guid>
		<description>Thanks Lillia. Appreciate the kind words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lillia. Appreciate the kind words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Listening to the Crickets by Paul Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://blog.channelsignal.com/index.php/2011/01/listening-to-the-crickets/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kirwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 04:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.channelsignal.com/?p=2373#comment-680</guid>
		<description>Great information David. Never knew this. Will read the article. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great information David. Never knew this. Will read the article. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You Tube for Your Brand? Really. by Paul Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://blog.channelsignal.com/index.php/2009/05/you-tube-for-your-brand-really/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kirwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 04:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.channelsignal.com/?p=674#comment-679</guid>
		<description>Thanks. Glad you are reading the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. Glad you are reading the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Listening to the Crickets by dvdsweeney</title>
		<link>http://blog.channelsignal.com/index.php/2011/01/listening-to-the-crickets/comment-page-1/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>dvdsweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 16:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.channelsignal.com/?p=2373#comment-667</guid>
		<description>An interesting addendum to this is Forrester&#039;s &quot;Social Technographics Ladder&quot;.

23% - 33%  of consumers create content online. The category is segmented by creators, conversationalists and critics. Given that a small percentage of a company&#039;s customers are creating content it&#039;s important to know what the other 70%-80% are taking in - and play a more active role in shaping / facilitating / engaging with what&#039;s being said.

http://blogs.forrester.com/jackie_rousseau_anderson/10-09-28-latest_global_social_media_trends_may_surprise_you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting addendum to this is Forrester&#8217;s &#8220;Social Technographics Ladder&#8221;.</p>
<p>23% &#8211; 33%  of consumers create content online. The category is segmented by creators, conversationalists and critics. Given that a small percentage of a company&#8217;s customers are creating content it&#8217;s important to know what the other 70%-80% are taking in &#8211; and play a more active role in shaping / facilitating / engaging with what&#8217;s being said.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/jackie_rousseau_anderson/10-09-28-latest_global_social_media_trends_may_surprise_you" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.forrester.com/jackie_rousseau_anderson/10-09-28-latest_global_social_media_trends_may_surprise_you</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When the Funnel Becomes the Bucket by Stephen Ovalle</title>
		<link>http://blog.channelsignal.com/index.php/2009/11/when-the-funnel-becomes-the-bucket/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Ovalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 13:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.channelsignal.com/?p=1165#comment-665</guid>
		<description>You made some good factors there. I did a search on the topic and located most individuals will agree with your blog. However, I’m having problems with viewing your blog, do you know whats going on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made some good factors there. I did a search on the topic and located most individuals will agree with your blog. However, I’m having problems with viewing your blog, do you know whats going on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Window to the World by Paul Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://blog.channelsignal.com/index.php/2009/07/window-to-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kirwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 03:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.channelsignal.com/?p=849#comment-632</guid>
		<description>Thank you Handyman. Appreciate the nice comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Handyman. Appreciate the nice comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Window to the World by scituate handyman</title>
		<link>http://blog.channelsignal.com/index.php/2009/07/window-to-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>scituate handyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.channelsignal.com/?p=849#comment-629</guid>
		<description>You picked a great topic for this post and you wrote about it well. I have seen several other websites with similar content but no 1 has completed a better job than you on writing about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You picked a great topic for this post and you wrote about it well. I have seen several other websites with similar content but no 1 has completed a better job than you on writing about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

